Dispute This!

I would be happy to hear anyone refute any of the following Observations of the President's 1st 100 Days:

1. Offended the Queen of England

2. Bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia

3. Praised the Marxist Daniel Ortega,

4. Kissed Hugo Chavez on the cheek

5. Endorsed the Socialist Evo Morales of Bolivia

6. Announced we would meet with Iranians with no pre-conditions

7. Gave away billions to AIG also without pre-conditions.

8. Expanded the bailouts

9. Insulted everyone who has ever loved a Special Olympian

10. Doubled our national debt

11. Announced a termination of the space defense system the day after the North Koreans launched an ICBM.

12. Despite the urgings of his own CIA director and the prior CIA directors, released information on intelligence gathering

13. Accepted without public comment the fact that five of his cabinet members cheated on their taxes and two others withdrew after they couldn't take the heat

14.. Appointed a Homeland Security Chief who quickly identified as "dangers to the nation", groups including veteran of the military, and opponents to abortion on demand, and who ordered that the word "terrorism" no longer be used but instead referred to such acts as "man made disasters.

15. Circled the globe so he could openly apologize for America's greatness.

16. Told Mexicans the violence in their country was because of us...

17. Politicized the census by moving it into the White House from its Department of Commerce origins

18. Appointed as Attorney General the man who orchestrated the forced removal and expulsion from America to Cuba of nine-year old whose mother died trying to bring him a life of freedom in the United States.

19. Salutes as heroes three Navy SEALS who took down three terrorists who threatened one American life and the next day announces members of the Bush administration will likely stand trial for torturing a terrorist who had played a part in killing
3000 Americans by pouring water up their nose.

20. Air Force One over New York City

21.. And last but certainly not least, wiped out the life saving of thousands of Chrysler and GM bond holders.

And now the police are stupid too.
1360 more FRIGHTENING days to go...but dang he reads a great speech!

Congress to Outsource U.S. Presidency

Congress Votes to Outsource Presidency
Washington, DC, July 10, 2009

Congress today announced that the office of President of the United States
of America will be outsourced to India as of September 1, 2009.

The move is being made in order to save the President's $500000 yearly
salary, and also a record $750 billion in deficit expenditures and related
overhead that his office has incurred during the last 3 months.

It is anticipated that $7 trillion can be saved to the end of the
President's term. "We believe this is a wise financial move. The cost
savings are huge," stated Congressman Thomas Reynolds (R-Wa). "We cannot
remain competitive on the world stage with the current level of cash
outlay," Reynolds noted.

Obama was informed by email this morning of his termination. Preparations
for the job move have been underway for some time.

Gurvinder Singh, a tele-technician for Indus Teleservices, Mumbai India,
will assume the office of President as of September 1, 2009. Mr. Singh was
born in the United States while his Indian parents were vacationing at
Niagara Falls, NY, thus making him eligible for the position. He will
receive a salary of $320 (USD) a month, but no health coverage or other
benefits. It is believed that Mr. Singh will be able to handle his job
responsibilities without a support staff.

Due to the time difference between the US and India, he will be working
primarily at night. "Working nights will allow me to keep my day job at the
Dell Computer call center," stated Mr. Singh in an exclusive interview. "I
am excited about this position. I always hoped I would be President."

A Congressional spokesperson noted that while Mr. Singh may not be fully
aware of all the issues involved in the office of President, this should not
be a problem as Obama had never been familiar with the issues either. Mr.
Singh will rely upon a script tree that will enable him to respond
effectively to most topics of concern. Using these canned responses, he can
address common concerns without having to understand the underlying issue at
all. "We know these scripting tools work," stated the spokesperson. "Obama
has used them successfully for years, with the result that some people
actually thought he knew what he was talking about."

Obama will receive health coverage, expenses, and salary until his final day
of employment. Following a 2-week waiting period, he will be eligible for
$140 a week unemployment for 26 weeks. Unfortunately he will not be
eligible for Medicaid, as his unemployment benefits will exceed the allowed
limit.

Obama has been provided with the outplacement services of Manpower, Inc. to
help him write a resume and prepare for his upcoming job transition.
According to Manpower, Obama may have difficulties in securing a new
position due to a lack of any successful work experience during his
lifetime.

A greeter position at Wal-Mart was suggested due to Obama's extensive
Experience at shaking hands, as well as his special smile.

Presidential comparison quiz

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Tony Blair a set of inexpensive and useless (to Tony Blair's UK video formatting) DVDs, when Tony Blair had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had bowed to the King of Saudi Arabia, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the non-existent "Austrian language," would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current on their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the national debt, which had taken more than two centuries to accumulate, in one year, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had then proposed to double the debt again within 10 years, would you have approved?

So, tell me again, what is it about Obama that makes him so brilliant and impressive?

Can't think of anything? Don't worry. He's done all this in 10 weeks -- so you'll have three years, nine-and-a-half months to come up with an answer.

Barack Obama A Marxist-Socialist in 1990's

From the AmeriPac.org website:

Barack Obama A Marxist-Socialist in 1990's
Web Bloggers Unearth Evidence Buried Deep by the Media

Socialist ”New Party” Connections to Obama included in this document:

• Obama member of Socialist Party
• Obama contract with Socialist Party
• Obama support of and by Socialist Party
• Obama Socialist Party connection to ACORN
• Obama Connection ACORN
• Obama Connection to Castro
• William Ayers Connection to Socialist Party
• William Ayers Connection to Castro

Democratic candidate Barack Obama was a member of the socialist New Party during the 1990s, according to new evidence unearthed by web bloggers. Obama received the Socialist party’s endorsement for his state Senate run in 1996.

Everything is documented at websites within the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party archives. There is no conjecture; no guessing the fact is that as recently as 1996 Senator Obama was an active member of the Chicago Democratic Socialist Party.

Will the mainstream media cover what once were allegations but which now appear to be proven facts? WE MUST FORCE THEM TO DO IT!

Reports earlier this summer that Obama was associated with the New Party were vigorously denied by the Obama campaign and the New Party, but researchers examining internet archives have found New Party documents clearly indicating Obama was a member of the party, received its endorsement and encouraged Party members to work with him in the Illinois statehouse.

"Progressive Populist" a socialist magazine, in November 1996 recognized that Obama was indeed an acknowledged member of the Socialist Party. "New Party members and supported candidates won 16 of 23 races… New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago. "

The Democratic Socialist Party of America published in their July/August Edition of New Ground 47 Newsletter. "The Chicago New Party is increasingly becoming a viable political organization… The New Party has continued to solidify this base...” “winning electoral primaries. All four candidates attended the NEW PARTY membership meeting on April 11th 1996 to express their gratitude. Barack Obama, victor in the 13th State Senate District, encouraged NPers to join in his task forces on Voter Education and Voter Registration." Part of the ACORN connection described later.

Senator Obama Signed a CONTRACT WITH THE CHICAGO SOCIALIST PARTY agreeing to maintain a relationship with the Marxist-led party during his senate term.

In the March - April, 1996 Edition of New Ground 45 in an article entitled, A Town Meeting on Economic Insecurity: Employment and Survival in Urban America By Bob Roman clearly states the Obama New Party connection. Written in the article is that Obama accepted NEW PARTY support and must sign a contract with the NEW PARTY where “the contract mandates that they (Obama) must have a visible and active relationship with the NEW PARTY”. The NEW PARTY's political strategy is to support progressive candidates in elections only if they have a concrete chance to "win". This has resulted in a winning ratio of 77 of 110 elections. Candidates must be approved via a NEW PARTY political committee. Once approved, candidates must sign a contract with the NEW PARTY. The contract mandates that they must have a visible and active relationship with the NEW PARTY. Obama was an approved and supported NEW PARTY candidate.

On the Democratic Socialist of America (DSA) website is a description of their political perspective called Where We Stand. It says, in part,

• We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo
  
  
• We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality, and non-oppressive relationships.

The New Party was active in the United States from 1992 to 1998. The Party’s Chicago chapter included a large number of Maoist and communist members, and a large number of members of the leftist organizing group ACORN.

Yes the same ACORN and Obama that have helped to create the largest financial crisis since The Great Depression are figures at the center of the high-risk subprime mortgage social engineering community service experiment by left-wing ACORN to apply socialism to the free market and redistribute housing wealth.

Yes, Mr. Obama knows a great deal about the mess. He is a central figure in the left-wing ACORN exploitation of financial institutions and pressuring them to make high risk loans. The very same left-wing ACORN was guilty of voter fraud in the last presidential election and appears to be involved in voter fraud today all across the US in Ohio, Indiana and Nevada where according to the Wall Street Journal state election officials raided the offices of the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, known as Acorn.

There will be whining and crying from the socialist liberal left about McCarthyism and guilt by association but we are entitled to know the political affiliations of a candidate for the nation’s highest office. The American people have a right to know what their candidates truly espouse, and we have a right to know the truth about what our candidates have done in their lives it goes strait to the issue of character and principles that go into leading as the next President of the United States.

Is Obama hiding a socialist or communist agenda? In spite of all the evidence Obama has denied or minimized these affiliations with hard-left figures, denied his membership in these Marxist political parties, and denied holding these beliefs.

We are told to ignore the past and to simply trust him on his intentions for the future. I would have a hard time mustering that trust for any political figure; to extend that trust to a figure with a track record of belonging to socialist political groups and lying about that membershipwould be a dangerous folly.

At best Obama is just unaware and being used but how can we have president that is dumb enough to get involved with a bunch of radical socialists sign a contract and not know what it means. Even worse Obama is smart knows exactly what he is doing and has adopted the Marxist-Socialist agenda of NEW PARTY and organizations like it.

We must not fool with the office of the president there is too much at stake.

Even the bomber William Ayers brother John Ayers is associated with NEW PARTY? Carl Davidson associated with Tom Hyden is associated with NEW PARTY and “Venceremos Brigades” went to Cuba trained in explosives by Castro. Then William Ayers turns into a domestic bomber.

Take a look at some of the history some of the friends of Obama that follows.

Davidson and Tom Hayden take credit for having launched in 1969 the "Venceremos Brigades," which covertly transported hundreds of young Americans to Cuba to help harvest sugar cane and interact with Havana's communist revolutionary leadership. (The Brigades were organized by Fidel Castro's Cuban intelligence agency, which trained "brigadistas" in guerrilla warfare techniques, including the use of arms and explosives.)

Many years later, Davidson would reflect on his SDS days when he, along with Dave Dellinger and Tom Hayden, had taken advantage of an opportunity to converse at length with President Castro. Said Davidson: "He [Castro] is a remarkable man, with a photographic memory, wide knowledge and keen insights.... We should all wish Fidel and Cuba well, and double our voices against the blockcade."

In the mid-1990s Davidson was a major player in the Chicago branch of the New Party, a Marxist political coalition whose objective was to endorse and elect leftist public officials. Most New Party members hailed from the Committees of Correspondence (the Marxist coalition cited in the preceding paragraph), the Democratic Socialists of America, and the militant leftist organization ACORN. Davidson first met Barack Obama through the New Party, which endorsed the latter in his run for the Illinois state senate in 1996. Obama had actively sought this endorsement, and he used a number of New Party volunteers as campaign workers.

Socialism 101....or How to become a right wing extreamist

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x8acl2_socialism-101-for-dummies_news?from=rss&hmz=706c61796572

2nd amendment

Very well stated,

Suzanna Gratia-Hupp

Dixie Chicks redux?

This was left as a comment and I thought it deserved the front page. Don't know how I missed this one. Thanks :)

"Let me rant a little:

While making a speech in France on the 3rd of April, our esteemed leader and #1 American made the following anti-American comments to a group of people who don’t necessarily see America in a positive light. This just days after presenting the King of Saudi Arabia with a FULL SUBMISSIVE bow:

" In America there's the failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America shown arrogance and been dismissive.."

How an American President could make comments like that without blinking an eye while the Dixie Chicks could make similar comments and be branded as un-American is beyond the pale. Is this “Chosen One” so above the rest of the world that whatever he does or says is OK? Is this another example of “not being proud of his country”? Is this the change the masses with “herd mentality” wants?"